The Biggest Loser: Who's Really Winning?
This week's guest post for Pop Health was written by Elana Premack Sandler, LCSW, MPH. Elana writes a popular blog for Psychology Today called, "Promoting Hope, Preventing Suicide". Written from both personal and professional perspectives, her blog explores suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention. Often using current events as a starting point, the blog poses questions about what could be done better or differently, what contributions research can make to practice, and challenges and opportunities inherent in new technologies. Elana earned a Master of Social Work and a Master of Public Health at Boston University and is a licensed social worker in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
There’s a lot of TV I don’t watch, but there’s one show in particular. “The Biggest Loser.”
It’s true - I systematically avoid watching one of the most popular reality TV shows in history. What seems to have drawn in viewers is what bothers me so much about most reality TV. It’s like a car wreck you can’t stop staring at, even though you know it’s a tragedy.
But watching a car wreck is watching an accident, something that wasn’t designed for an audience. With an accident, there’s something very human about wanting to see what’s happened, wanting to know if everyone’s okay.
That’s very different from what I think happens when people watch “The Biggest Loser.”
The few times I watched (I kept trying - people I love and trust told me it was such a good show!), I just wasn’t able to get behind the premise of the show. Yes, I believe that people who have struggled to lose weight can benefit from personal training and major lifestyle changes. Sure, the power of competition can drive some people to work harder than they ever imagined possible.
But, shame? Does shame really help people change their behavior?
When I watched, I witnessed trainers shaming contestants, over and over, in different ways. I heard contestants talk about the shame they experienced as a part of being obese or overweight. The whole show was a shame-fest. Which made me extremely uncomfortable.
Because, when it comes down to it, “The Biggest Loser” is a game show. And I just can’t watch people shamed into losing weight just to win a game show. “But it’s not just a game show!” my friends-who-are-fans would say. “People change their lives.”
Oh, wait, you’re right. It’s not just a game show. It’s a franchise.
So, I guess what I really have a hard time with is people being shamed into losing weight to support a game show-Wii-resort-1,200 calorie-a-day diet franchise.
At my professional core, as a public health social worker, I know shame doesn’t work to change behavior. I had thought it was just me who thought that way, until I started reading researcher BrenĂ© Brown’s book, “I Thought It Was Just Me (but it isn’t): Telling the Truth About Perfectionism, Inadequacy, and Power.”
Brown has been researching shame for the past 10 years. But, even before she was a shame expert, she was a social worker, working with people. What did she learn? “You cannot shame or belittle people into changing their behaviors.”
She explains in the introduction to the book:
What’s extra-disturbing about how “The Biggest Loser” uses shame is that it doesn’t limit shame to contestants. The show projects shame into the viewing audience, reinforcing biases against people who are overweight or obese. The audience doesn’t root for contestants to work within the challenges inherent in their bodies to figure out a healthy, sustainable way to lose weight and maintain overall health. The audience roots for contestants to not be fat. (Please excuse my lax grammar- I hope it’s worth making the point.)
Finally, the drama of the show revolves around shame. There’s a big reveal every episode, when viewers find out who won’t continue to compete to be The Biggest Loser. If contestants can’t lose weight within the show’s parameters (which include unhealthy weight loss practices, like dehydration), they get kicked off. So, the ideal of working with a supportive trainer goes out the window - and you are shamed, shamed, shamed into returning home, still fat, and, well, not a winner. A loser.
“The Biggest Loser” raises several questions for me:
There’s a lot of TV I don’t watch, but there’s one show in particular. “The Biggest Loser.”
It’s true - I systematically avoid watching one of the most popular reality TV shows in history. What seems to have drawn in viewers is what bothers me so much about most reality TV. It’s like a car wreck you can’t stop staring at, even though you know it’s a tragedy.
But watching a car wreck is watching an accident, something that wasn’t designed for an audience. With an accident, there’s something very human about wanting to see what’s happened, wanting to know if everyone’s okay.
That’s very different from what I think happens when people watch “The Biggest Loser.”
The few times I watched (I kept trying - people I love and trust told me it was such a good show!), I just wasn’t able to get behind the premise of the show. Yes, I believe that people who have struggled to lose weight can benefit from personal training and major lifestyle changes. Sure, the power of competition can drive some people to work harder than they ever imagined possible.
But, shame? Does shame really help people change their behavior?
When I watched, I witnessed trainers shaming contestants, over and over, in different ways. I heard contestants talk about the shame they experienced as a part of being obese or overweight. The whole show was a shame-fest. Which made me extremely uncomfortable.
Because, when it comes down to it, “The Biggest Loser” is a game show. And I just can’t watch people shamed into losing weight just to win a game show. “But it’s not just a game show!” my friends-who-are-fans would say. “People change their lives.”
Oh, wait, you’re right. It’s not just a game show. It’s a franchise.
So, I guess what I really have a hard time with is people being shamed into losing weight to support a game show-Wii-resort-1,200 calorie-a-day diet franchise.
At my professional core, as a public health social worker, I know shame doesn’t work to change behavior. I had thought it was just me who thought that way, until I started reading researcher BrenĂ© Brown’s book, “I Thought It Was Just Me (but it isn’t): Telling the Truth About Perfectionism, Inadequacy, and Power.”
Brown has been researching shame for the past 10 years. But, even before she was a shame expert, she was a social worker, working with people. What did she learn? “You cannot shame or belittle people into changing their behaviors.”
She explains in the introduction to the book:
- Can you use shame or humiliation to change people or behavior? Yes and no. Yes, you can try. In fact, if you really want to zero in on an exposed vulnerability, you could actually see a swift behavior change.
- Will the change last? No.
- Will it hurt? Yes, it’s excruciating. [I cringed when I read that part.]
- Will it do any damage? Yes, and it has the potential to sear both the person using shame and the person being shamed. [More cringing.]
- Is shame used very often as a way to try to change people? Yes, every minute of every day.
What’s extra-disturbing about how “The Biggest Loser” uses shame is that it doesn’t limit shame to contestants. The show projects shame into the viewing audience, reinforcing biases against people who are overweight or obese. The audience doesn’t root for contestants to work within the challenges inherent in their bodies to figure out a healthy, sustainable way to lose weight and maintain overall health. The audience roots for contestants to not be fat. (Please excuse my lax grammar- I hope it’s worth making the point.)
Finally, the drama of the show revolves around shame. There’s a big reveal every episode, when viewers find out who won’t continue to compete to be The Biggest Loser. If contestants can’t lose weight within the show’s parameters (which include unhealthy weight loss practices, like dehydration), they get kicked off. So, the ideal of working with a supportive trainer goes out the window - and you are shamed, shamed, shamed into returning home, still fat, and, well, not a winner. A loser.
“The Biggest Loser” raises several questions for me:
- Should a game show be allowed to promote unhealthy weight loss practices?
- What kinds of messages does the show send to young people about their worth and value?
- In what ways are people at a healthy weight influenced by “The Biggest Loser”?
Integrating Public Health Content Into Media Coverage of Celebrity DUIs
Amanda Bynes is just the latest young female celebrity to be arrested for driving under the influence (DUI). The media coverage has been extensive, with some outlets even raising the question, "Is she the next Lindsay Lohan?" A fellow former child star, Lindsay Lohan has consistently been in the news the past 5 years with DUI arrests, rehab stints, and poor career decisions. However, just a few weeks ago we heard the good news that she has been taken off probation from her DUI case...so hopefully things are looking up.
Pop Health has written about related issues in the past: how soon is too soon to find a teachable moment in a celebrity DUI death? How does popular media help establish the public health agenda? How does media coverage of public health issues (e.g., suicide) affect the public's health?
So now let's put the pieces together and discuss the work of public health researchers that focuses specifically on media coverage of young female celebrity DUIs. In 2009, Smith, Twum, and Gielen published "Media Coverage of Celebrity DUIs: Teachable Moments or Problematic Social Modeling?" in the journal of Alcohol & Alcoholism. They conducted an analysis of US media coverage of four female celebrities (Michelle Rodriguez, Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie and Lindsay Lohan). The study examined media coverage in the year after their DUI arrests (December 2005 through June 2008). Among other things, the stories were coded for the presence of public health content (e.g., arrest, death, and injury statistics for DUI). The authors found that the coverage was primarily focused on the individual celebrities (i.e., their legal and professional repercussions) versus broader social or public health impacts. They recommended that future research examine both the news coverage and the comprehension and use of that content for policy and behavior change initiatives.
Coverage of a celebrity DUI has the potential to be a teachable moment, but we as public health practitioners need to take advantage of it. We need to be monitoring pop culture news so that these teachable moments can be identified. We need to partner with journalists in order to make sure that a "public health frame" is incorporated in the development of the articles. Most importantly, we need to continue to evaluate the media content and use that data to develop effective interventions and policy recommendations.
What do you think?
Pop Health has written about related issues in the past: how soon is too soon to find a teachable moment in a celebrity DUI death? How does popular media help establish the public health agenda? How does media coverage of public health issues (e.g., suicide) affect the public's health?
So now let's put the pieces together and discuss the work of public health researchers that focuses specifically on media coverage of young female celebrity DUIs. In 2009, Smith, Twum, and Gielen published "Media Coverage of Celebrity DUIs: Teachable Moments or Problematic Social Modeling?" in the journal of Alcohol & Alcoholism. They conducted an analysis of US media coverage of four female celebrities (Michelle Rodriguez, Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie and Lindsay Lohan). The study examined media coverage in the year after their DUI arrests (December 2005 through June 2008). Among other things, the stories were coded for the presence of public health content (e.g., arrest, death, and injury statistics for DUI). The authors found that the coverage was primarily focused on the individual celebrities (i.e., their legal and professional repercussions) versus broader social or public health impacts. They recommended that future research examine both the news coverage and the comprehension and use of that content for policy and behavior change initiatives.
Coverage of a celebrity DUI has the potential to be a teachable moment, but we as public health practitioners need to take advantage of it. We need to be monitoring pop culture news so that these teachable moments can be identified. We need to partner with journalists in order to make sure that a "public health frame" is incorporated in the development of the articles. Most importantly, we need to continue to evaluate the media content and use that data to develop effective interventions and policy recommendations.
What do you think?
- What strategies/information channels do you use to stay on top of public health-pop culture news?
- How can the public health and journalism fields partner to take advantage of teachable moments and cover public health issues safely and effectively?
"E-Lane" for Pedestrians: An April Fools' Day Prank With Real Public Health Implications
Earlier this week, Philadelphians were treated to an April Fools' Day prank courtesy of Mayor Michael Nutter and the city's Office of Transportation and Utilities. Across the street from city hall, an "E-Lane" was designated for pedestrians who use (and are distracted by) their electronic devices while walking. While the city only expects to keep the joke "E-Lane" around for a week, they also hope that it starts a dialogue about pedestrian safety and people looking out for themselves while walking around the city. Since this April Fools' week also happens to coincide with National Public Health Week (a time dedicated to recognizing the contributions and challenges of public health), I thought it was a great story for Pop Health. So I took a stroll down the "E-Lane" on Monday to take these pictures and to get the dialogue started.
While I have written about (and am a huge supporter of) the vast and ever expanding benefits of mobile devices for public health, I also acknowledge the challenges that they have created. Even though Philadelphia created the "E-Lane" as a joke, drivers and pedestrians distracted by electronic devices have become a serious issue.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website on distracted driving tells us that each day, more than 15 people are killed and more than 1,200 people are injured in crashes that were reported to involve a distracted driver. Distracted driving occurs while doing another activity that takes your attention away from driving; these activities can increase the chance of a motor vehicle crash. While distracted driving can include talking on a cell phone, texting, or eating, texting is most dangerous because it takes your eyes off the road (visual), hands off the wheel (manual), and takes your mind off driving (cognitive).
As with any emerging public health problem, we are beginning to see:
What do you think?
While I have written about (and am a huge supporter of) the vast and ever expanding benefits of mobile devices for public health, I also acknowledge the challenges that they have created. Even though Philadelphia created the "E-Lane" as a joke, drivers and pedestrians distracted by electronic devices have become a serious issue.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website on distracted driving tells us that each day, more than 15 people are killed and more than 1,200 people are injured in crashes that were reported to involve a distracted driver. Distracted driving occurs while doing another activity that takes your attention away from driving; these activities can increase the chance of a motor vehicle crash. While distracted driving can include talking on a cell phone, texting, or eating, texting is most dangerous because it takes your eyes off the road (visual), hands off the wheel (manual), and takes your mind off driving (cognitive).
As with any emerging public health problem, we are beginning to see:
- Research: papers on distracted drivers and pedestrians are being published in the peer reviewed literature.
- Education: cautionary tales of distracted driving are emerging in the popular media. Just in the past few months, the Today Show has hosted several sets of parents who lost children due to texting and driving.
- Celebrity Spokespeople: Teen sensation Justin Bieber is partnering with the Remember Alex Brown Foundation and Phone Guard's Drive Safe.ly application to promote responsible texting. The application reads text (SMS) messages and emails aloud in real time and automatically responds without drivers touching the mobile phone.
- Policy Change: Just a few weeks ago, Pennsylvania became the 35th state to enact an anti-texting law. The new law allows police to charge anyone caught text messaging while operating a vehicle with a primary offense and a $50 fine.
What do you think?
- How can we balance the benefits and challenges of mobile technology for public health?
- Do you think the "E-Lane" in Philadelphia is an effective strategy for initiating dialogue around distracted drivers and pedestrians?
- In addition to the strategies listed above, what can public health and the public do to reduce injuries and deaths from distracted drivers and pedestrians?
Germanium
Germanium is a much-acclaimed trace element. Nutritionally, organic germanium boosts the immune system by stimulating the production of interferon and other immune cells, increasing resistance to various diseases. It also lowers the oxygen requirements of body organs and is a powerful antioxidant, reducing peroxidation damage, and helping the debilitating diseases of ageing. As such, it was found to have a beneficial effect on ovarian malignancies, colon cancer and Hodgkin's disease. Organic germanium was also found to have anti-arthritic properties.
Trace amounts of germanium are present in most foods, but richer amounts are found in ginseng, garlic, aloe vera and comfrey, which may partially explain the health promoting effects of these foods. Germanium is also available as a supplement in health food shops, and online.
Trace amounts of germanium are present in most foods, but richer amounts are found in ginseng, garlic, aloe vera and comfrey, which may partially explain the health promoting effects of these foods. Germanium is also available as a supplement in health food shops, and online.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)